- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:03:15 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-06-11 17:54, James M Snell wrote: > I can definitely live with that.. anything that increases the > visibility of censorship is not a bad thing. Looks like status code > 427 is open currently. > ... So is 418. In any case, if we go there it should be 451. Best regards, Julian PS: and I do agree with Mark that it's unlikely that it'll be tricky to get something standardized that might give the impression that censorship is ok.
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 16:03:50 UTC