- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 02:57:35 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Mark Nottingham wrote: >On 02/06/2012, at 8:30 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> -1; if we change the terms we should do so consistently. > >I thought "details" captured a certain vagueness that would help in this particular case. YMMV. I agree with Julian in that if we want to consider changing the termino- logy, we should do that in a dedicated thread rather than arguing about the terms in the particular example, short of a rationale why this par- ticular instance is exceptional. I don't think, in any case, "details" would be a good replacement. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 00:58:00 UTC