- From: Musatov, Martin - CW <Martin.Musatov@bestbuy.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:34:27 +0000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Christian RIGONI <christian.rigoni@tic-congo.com>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Always attribute to kindness what can adequately be explained to competence
-----Original Message-----
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:34 AM
To: Christian RIGONI
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: add GETAJAX verb/method in http protocol
In message <4FBB98E7.9020208@tic-congo.com>, Christian RIGONI writes:
>Now, suppose the user modify an element of the page. It can be useful
>to send a http GETAJAX request [...]
Varnish can handle pretty much any weird request, but you have to neuter some of the rfc2616 heuristics.
Before vcl_miss{} is called, the req.request is forced to "GET", you will have to undo that, but I think that is about it.
Something like this should do it:
sub vcl_recv {
set req.http.x-real-req = req.request;
}
sub vcl_miss {
if (req.http.x-real-req == "GETAJAX") {
set bereq.request = "GETAJAX";
}
unset bereq.http.x-real-req;
}
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 19:35:31 UTC