Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-http-forwarded-02.txt - section 5.1

• From: Andreas Petersson <andreas@sbin.se>
• Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 11:34:03 +0200
• To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <20120504113403.5a65e4ff@hetzer>

On Wed, 02 May 2012 14:32:59 +1200
Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> ** section 5.1, must it be an interface label?
> 
> what about interception ports where the TCP details are not related to 
> the interface in any way and both details needed?
> what about interfaces labelled with non-alphanumeric characters?
> 
> 
> AYJ

Hi, 

Can you explain how you mean/give some examples?

 /andreas

Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 09:34:40 UTC