- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:43:04 -0500
- To: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
- Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
These were the easiest to find: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2006Apr/0295.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0226.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0643.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0737.html Cheers, On 06/04/2012, at 1:35 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > Having followed the CORS spec (and contributed to it on occasion) over > the past couple years, I don't recall seeing any comments from any of > you, or seeing any particularly strong opposition to it, apart from > the people proposing UMP as an alternative to avoid the ambient > authority issues. > > Given that (I believe) every major browser is shipping at least > partial if not full support for the spec already, I believe this ship > has long since sailed, but I at least would be interested in why you > think it's a bad design or how you would do things differently. Is > there some list archive where I should look for your comments, or do > you mind reposting them? > > -- Dirk > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:33 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >> I would certainly have to agree with your personal note... >> unfortunately, as you point out, the WGs working on it haven't really >> been that open to opposing opinions on it. Unfortunate but sadly not >> surprising. I largely intend to just ignore it for as long as >> possible. >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >>> HTTP folks may be interested in the Last Call for the W3C's CORS: >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-security/2012Apr/0001.html >>> >>> <personal_note> >>> I've made several comments to the various WGs this specification has resided in over the years; I feel it's a bad design for the Web and needlessly complex and chatty. I'll likely be making similar comments in their LC period. I doubt anything will change, however. >>> </personal_note> >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Nottingham >>> http://www.mnot.net/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 6 April 2012 18:43:31 UTC