- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 21:27:23 +0200
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, "William Chan (?????????)" <willchan@chromium.org>, patrick mcmanus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Peter L <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Hi, On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:55:18AM -0700, Mike Belshe wrote: > In general, I think we should stop talking about unknown transports or > transports which we don't think are targets (and I put SCTP into this > category). Designing for transports that don't exist is likely to make our > implementations on the transports that do exist (TCP) watered down or > worse. In other words, the least-common-denominator sucks.... Further, > NOBODY is going to implement HTTP/2.0 on the unknown transport. So > whatever we do design for these unknown transports will be untested and > purely theoretical. +1, let's keep that for later, we just need not to overdesign in order not to make this harder later. Willy
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 19:28:02 UTC