On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote: > > > On 5/04/2012 11:29 p.m., Willy Tarreau wrote: > >> That's what I'd really like to see happen : a smooth and transparent >> opening of 2.0. Probably that for HTTPS, NPN might result in a faster >> adoption since there are less controls, so that will not change anything >> for admins : either they already block and will continue to do so, or they >> already don't care and wont either. >> > > I think a lot of the sites that allow 443 through are growing more and > more uncomfortable with it. So it's likely to change, esp as traffic > migrates to https. > > Therefore I wouldn't assume things will remain the way they currently are > - in terms of people allowing or not caring. > > I think the "smooth" upgrade path might take aeons :) > > It would be interesting if it were possible to do an experiment using > another port. Google would be in a position to test that :) Do you mean like we did for the WebSocket experiment over port 61985? See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg05593.html. I'm already having a lot of discussions internally at Google with various folks about experiments we can run to provide data here. If you have any suggestions, I'm open to implementing them. > > > Adrien > > > -- > Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com > > >
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 11:57:03 UTC