- From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 23:50:33 +1200
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- CC: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 5/04/2012 11:29 p.m., Willy Tarreau wrote: > That's what I'd really like to see happen : a smooth and transparent > opening of 2.0. Probably that for HTTPS, NPN might result in a faster > adoption since there are less controls, so that will not change > anything for admins : either they already block and will continue to > do so, or they already don't care and wont either. I think a lot of the sites that allow 443 through are growing more and more uncomfortable with it. So it's likely to change, esp as traffic migrates to https. Therefore I wouldn't assume things will remain the way they currently are - in terms of people allowing or not caring. I think the "smooth" upgrade path might take aeons :) It would be interesting if it were possible to do an experiment using another port. Google would be in a position to test that :) Adrien -- Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 11:51:02 UTC