- From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:56:36 +0000
- To: "Brian Pane" <brianp@brianp.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
------ Original Message ------ From: "Brian Pane" <brianp@brianp.net> To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Sent: 3/04/2012 5:48:42 a.m. Subject: Re: Ascii-based SPDY "compression" idea >On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > >> >>In message <CAAbTgTs55FmKP+HOKhNOz-q_SY1cBec7XLpxqruhFN-+TxtieA@mail.gmail.com> >>, Brian Pane writes: >> >> >>> >>>In terms of performance, that's a step backwards from SPDY in two ways: >>> >>>- An additional round trip is needed to negotiate the use of HTTP/2.0. >>> >> >> >>You mean that it suffers from being interoperable with HTTP/1.1 ? >> > > >SPDY also is interoperable with HTTP/1.1 -- it can cleanly SSL-tunnel >through intermediaries > for now. > -- without adding that extra round trip. > > > >-Brian > > >
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 20:57:04 UTC