- From: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:48:42 -0700
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <CAAbTgTs55FmKP+HOKhNOz-q_SY1cBec7XLpxqruhFN-+TxtieA@mail.gmail.com> > , Brian Pane writes: > >>In terms of performance, that's a step backwards from SPDY in two ways: >> >>- An additional round trip is needed to negotiate the use of HTTP/2.0. > > You mean that it suffers from being interoperable with HTTP/1.1 ? SPDY also is interoperable with HTTP/1.1 -- it can cleanly SSL-tunnel through intermediaries -- without adding that extra round trip. -Brian
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 17:49:10 UTC