Re: status code for header fields to big

On 2011-12-02 23:21, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
> Sorry, me confused about two different headers.
>
> We did not change 413, as 431 was on the table.
>
> We *did* extend 503, and this can be backed out if we get 429.
> ...

Proposed change: 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/255/255.diff>