Can we leave the reference to the retry-after header def (line 2282)? Cheers, On 03/12/2011, at 8:08 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-02 23:21, Julian Reschke wrote: >> ... >> Sorry, me confused about two different headers. >> >> We did not change 413, as 431 was on the table. >> >> We *did* extend 503, and this can be backed out if we get 429. >> ... > > Proposed change: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/255/255.diff> -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 01:03:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:26 UTC