Re: #255 and #299: Status code semantics

On 2011-12-03 00:34, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/255>
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/299>
>
> Both of these tickets are about expanding / refining the semantics of existing status codes.
>
> However, draft-nottingham-http-new-status has been taken up as an AD-sponsored draft, and provides specific, new status codes for those semantics. So, I propose we close these tickets with no action (in the case of #255, this means backing out our previous changes).
>
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/nottingham-http-new-status>
>
> Thoughts?

+1