Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods

On 2011-07-19 09:34, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:27:28 +0200, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> The bug is that it offers to do a GET. Why would you ever want that?
>
> I thought Roy said in some other thread that clients could do whatever
> they want? Anyway, this is going away.

Clients in theory can do what they want, but it's very strange that one 
of the options is for a thing that seems to be the wrong thing all the time.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 08:40:42 UTC