Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods

On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:27:28 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> The bug is that it offers to do a GET. Why would you ever want that?

I thought Roy said in some other thread that clients could do whatever  
they want? Anyway, this is going away.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 08:34:37 UTC