- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:05:56 +0200
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2011-07-18 04:21, Amos Jeffries wrote: > ... > This MSIE handling of 301 is a big problem in some installations. To the > point that they are migrating their customers away from MSIE just to get > the Firefox/Chrome behaviour. > ... How so? Why don't they fix their sites? Details, please. > ... >> All that said, GET and POST are vastly more common for browsers to >> handle than other methods. Having reasonable requirements for GET and >> POST would be a welcome step forward. >> >> Adam > > Even just idempotent / non-idempotent separation would be great. That > also leaves it open for consistency with future methods. > ... That doesn't work, as given a new method name, you don't know whether it's idempotent or not. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 07:06:33 UTC