- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:36:09 +1200
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:30:18 -0700, Brian Pane wrote: <snip> > Thus the aggressive implementation performs 1xRTT faster in the best > case. Yes, it wastes upstream bandwidth in the worst case, because > it > ends up sending all but one of the requests twice. But for a typical > web browser issuing a series of GETs, upstream bandwidth is an > abundant resource and network round trips are expensive, so I'd > rather > spend bandwidth less efficiently in the worst case to save on round > trips in the best case. Please have some consideration for those of us who still live with ADSL and satellite connections (or heaven forbid, 56K). Where upstream bandwidth is the overall limiting bottlneck. AYJ
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 01:37:00 UTC