Re: 1xx response semantics

On 2011-07-06 02:19, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> ...
> What do people think about adding text to the "Considerations for New Headers" section stating that headers may not be available on 1xx responses in some implementations?
> ...

Do you have an example of an implementation that *does* expose 1xx 
responses, but not the headers on them?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 00:44:02 UTC