- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:35:35 +0200
- To: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
- Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Brian Pane wrote: >Speaking of the 101/Upgrade mechanism... it seems fundamentally >incompatible with request pipelining. If the first request in a >pipeline indicates a willingness to upgrade to some non-HTTP protocol, >and the server decides to switch to that other protocol upon receipt >of the first request, the subsequent requests already in the pipeline >may very well be syntactically invalid in the newly chosen protocol. > >Should the HTTP/1.1 spec thus prohibit the use of the Upgrade header >in pipelined requests, or is the issue too obvious to document >explicitly? In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JulSep/0293.html I mentioned this, I'm not sure if we track this under some issue number. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 19:35:57 UTC