- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:40:58 +0100
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Bryce Nesbitt <bnesbitt@bepress.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
On 13.11.2010 02:04, Adrien de Croy wrote: > ... > Is this Refresh header (which isn't in HTTP, so surely should be > X-Refresh?) legit? Is it supported? > ... Well, it's widely implemented, just not registered. Prefixing with "X-" wouldn't help; "X-" isn't special for message headers. As far as I can tell, the right thing to do is to write a short Internet Draft specifying the syntax and the semantics and registering it. Bonus points for discussing alternate approaches (Retry-After, Redirects), and the connection to HTML... Best regards, Julian PS: I'm glad to help with the formatting if an IETF "newbie" wants to give this a try...
Received on Saturday, 13 November 2010 09:41:48 UTC