- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:57:10 +1000
- To: Jorrit Jongma <Jorrit@Jongma.org>
- Cc: 'Henrik Nordström' <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
See also:
http://www.w3.org/mid/0BD82EFC-9F0D-4122-89FE-E245E32AE22C@yahoo-inc.com
If you're going to suggest replacement text, please incorporate the changes in -latest (if you haven't already); see
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/29
Cheers,
On 31/05/2010, at 11:04 PM, Jorrit Jongma wrote:
> Henrik,
>
> Thank you for your insights and corrections.
>
> If I understand you correctly, the following pseudo-code would cover all the cases, taking -09 as base, and completely bypassing date_value if possible:
>
> if (response_version_1_1 && !response_via_1_0) {
> corrected_initial_age = age_value + (response_time - request_time);
> } else {
> apparent_age = max(0, response_time - date_value);
> corrected_received_age = max(apparent_age, age_value);
> response_delay = response_time - request_time;
> corrected_initial_age = corrected_received_age + response_delay;
> }
> resident_time = now - response_time;
> current_age = correct_initial_age + resident_time;
>
> I have tested current operation in a few browsers, and the results are not encouraging; if the above is judged correct it is my intent to submit bug tickets to some of these browser manufacturers and see if they will update.
>
> Regards,
> Jorrit
>
>
>
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 11:57:29 UTC