Re: ticket 208, Re: RFC 5861 on HTTP Cache-Control Extensions for Stale Content

On 15.05.2010 17:19, Bil Corry wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote on 5/9/2010 6:36 AM:
>> The only *new* registry that we added before is for method names, and
>> indeed we have the registrations for all non-HTTP/1.1 methods in a
>> separate document
>> (<>).
> Shouldn't it also include the HTTP methods as well?  Or am I misunderstanding its purpose?

Those registrations are in the base spec.

> Small typo, MKAKTIVITY should be MKACTIVITY.

Oops. Good catch.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 16 May 2010 09:57:37 UTC