Re: ticket 208, Re: RFC 5861 on HTTP Cache-Control Extensions for Stale Content from Bil Corry on 2010-05-15 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 08:19:28 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4BEEBB80.90603@corry.biz>

Julian Reschke wrote on 5/9/2010 6:36 AM: 
> The only *new* registry that we added before is for method names, and
> indeed we have the registrations for all non-HTTP/1.1 methods in a
> separate document
> (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-latest.html>).

Shouldn't it also include the HTTP methods as well?  Or am I misunderstanding its purpose?

Small typo, MKAKTIVITY should be MKACTIVITY.


- Bil

Received on Saturday, 15 May 2010 15:20:36 UTC