- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:08:40 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
Works for me. On 26/04/2010, at 9:00 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 23.04.2010 05:46, Thomson, Martin wrote: >> Mark: >>> Suggested introduction: >>> >>> HTTP requests often do not carry the absolute-URI [ref to 3986] for >>> they are intended; instead, the value needs to be inferred from the >>> request-target, Host header and other context. The result of this >>> process is the "Effective Request URI." >> >> The first part of this sentence doesn't parse for me. Perhaps: >> >> HTTP requests often do not carry an absolute URI [RFC3986]. The absolute URI is instead inferred from the... >> ... > > Oh. > > Proposal: > > "HTTP requests often do not carry the absolute URI ([RFC3986], Section 4.3) for the resource they are intended for; instead, the value needs to be inferred from the request-target, Host header and other context. The result of this process is the "Effective Request URI"." > > (I think have the ABNF components from which the URI is derived from is fine). > > Best regards, Julian -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 26 April 2010 11:09:14 UTC