- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:02:45 +0200
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi, in part 1 we currently say: "The field value MAY be preceded by optional whitespace; a single SP is preferred. The field-value does not include any leading or trailing white space: OWS occurring before the first non-whitespace character of the field-value or after the last non-whitespace character of the field-value is ignored and MAY be removed without changing the meaning of the header field." -- <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-07.html#rfc.section.4.2.p.4> In the current edits, the last 'MAY' is a 'SHOULD', which makes it read "A field value MAY be preceded by optional whitespace (OWS); a single SP is preferred. The field value does not include any leading or trailing white space: OWS occurring before the first non-whitespace character of the field value or after the last non-whitespace character of the field value is ignored and SHOULD be removed without changing the meaning of the header field." I think what we really should say is that they MAY be removed before passing the field-value to a specific header parser, thus definitions of headers MUST NOT make the presence of trailing/leading whitespace semantically significant. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 15:03:34 UTC