- From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:41:54 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > "A field value MAY be preceded by optional whitespace (OWS); a single SP > is preferred. The field value does not include any leading or trailing > white space: OWS occurring before the first non-whitespace character of > the field value or after the last non-whitespace character of the field > value is ignored and SHOULD be removed without changing the meaning of > the header field." > > I think what we really should say is that they MAY be removed before > passing the field-value to a specific header parser, thus definitions of > headers MUST NOT make the presence of trailing/leading whitespace > semantically significant. Should proxies edit the leading or trailing OWS before forwarding headers? -- Jamie
Received on Saturday, 26 September 2009 14:42:30 UTC