Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> What I wanted to say is that the text in the registry *can* be read to
> support only relations to *direct* parents.

I feel a bit stupid, but I'm not sure what "direct" means here. Or at least, my
only interpretation of it seems contradictory to the idea that one could
interpret the registration to require it.

Could you provide a few examples?


Noah Slater,

Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:40:55 UTC