- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:46:31 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Noah Slater wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: >> What I wanted to say is that the text in the registry *can* be read to >> support only relations to *direct* parents. > > I feel a bit stupid, but I'm not sure what "direct" means here. Or at least, my > only interpretation of it seems contradictory to the idea that one could > interpret the registration to require it. > > Could you provide a few examples? "direct parent" as in "parent", as opposed to "grandparent" or further ancestors. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:47:18 UTC