Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

Noah Slater wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> What I wanted to say is that the text in the registry *can* be read to
>> support only relations to *direct* parents.
> I feel a bit stupid, but I'm not sure what "direct" means here. Or at least, my
> only interpretation of it seems contradictory to the idea that one could
> interpret the registration to require it.
> Could you provide a few examples?

"direct parent" as in "parent", as opposed to "grandparent" or further 

BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:47:18 UTC