- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:58:51 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Re-closed. On 06/08/2009, at 9:23 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hi Adam, >> Actually, there were a number of people arguing in the Stockholm >> meeting that HTTP does indeed define the interpretation of the data >> type of a message, which is why the proposal to delete it was made. >> As you point out, this is just a note, and doesn't affect >> conformance; it is still completely conformant to sniff the type of >> a message (because what you *do* with the data type is still up to >> the application). >> Cheers, >> ... > > I made the proposed change (taking out that paragraph) with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/663 > >. > > BR, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 04:59:32 UTC