Re: Update on issue 155 (Content Sniffing)


On 06/08/2009, at 9:23 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>> Actually, there were a number of people arguing in the Stockholm  
>> meeting that HTTP does indeed define the interpretation of the data  
>> type of a message, which is why the proposal to delete it was made.
>> As you point out, this is just a note, and doesn't affect  
>> conformance; it is still completely conformant to sniff the type of  
>> a message (because what you *do* with the data type is still up to  
>> the application).
>> Cheers,
>> ...
> I made the proposed change (taking out that paragraph) with < 
> >.
> BR, Julian

Mark Nottingham

Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 04:59:32 UTC