Re: Update on issue 155 (Content Sniffing)

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> 
> Actually, there were a number of people arguing in the Stockholm meeting 
> that HTTP does indeed define the interpretation of the data type of a 
> message, which is why the proposal to delete it was made.
> 
> As you point out, this is just a note, and doesn't affect conformance; 
> it is still completely conformant to sniff the type of a message 
> (because what you *do* with the data type is still up to the application).
> 
> Cheers,
> ...

I made the proposed change (taking out that paragraph) with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/663>.

BR, Julian

Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 11:23:52 UTC