- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:50:50 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:28:37 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> we discussed the issue of content sniffing again during the HTTPbis WG >> meeting and the general feeling was that we were going to far with the >> statement: >> >> "Note that neither the interpretation of the data type of a message nor >> the behaviors caused by it are defined by HTTP; this potentially >> includes examination of the content to override any indicated type >> ("sniffing")." >> >> The proposal is to remove this altogether. >> >> See <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/155#comment:3> >> >> Feedback appreciated, > > This would disallow e.g. the behavior of <img src> or <script src> as exhibited by Web browsers as I understand things. Having said that, notes are typically non-normative so maybe it does not? Maybe we ought to say: "Note that neither the interpretation of the data type of a message nor the behaviors caused by it are defined by HTTP." No one seems to be arguing about this statement, but it's non-obvious to folks reading the spec and therefore worth noting, Adam
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 19:53:44 UTC