- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:41:14 +0100
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- CC: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Henrik Nordstrom schrieb: > Jeffrey Mogul schrieb: >> Proposal: just say...: >> >> Other hop-by-hop headers MUST be listed in a Connection header >> (Section 14.10). > > ons 2006-12-13 klockan 11:44 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > >> Future revisions of the HTTP/1.1 specification and later >> versions of HTTP MAY introduce new hop-by-hop headers. Those >> headers MUST be listed in a Connection header (Section 14.10) >> for backwards compatibility with this specification. > > Think I prefer Jeffs simple and concise definition. We also have RFC2145 > (even if informal) which do guide future specification authors how to > read this.. > ... Ack. See proposed fix in <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.13.5.1-connection_misleading>. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 12:41:30 UTC