Jeffrey Mogul schrieb: > Proposal: just say...: > > Other hop-by-hop headers MUST be listed in a Connection header > (Section 14.10). ons 2006-12-13 klockan 11:44 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > Future revisions of the HTTP/1.1 specification and later > versions of HTTP MAY introduce new hop-by-hop headers. Those > headers MUST be listed in a Connection header (Section 14.10) > for backwards compatibility with this specification. Think I prefer Jeffs simple and concise definition. We also have RFC2145 (even if informal) which do guide future specification authors how to read this.. On a side note personally I think it was a mistake to define hop-by-hop headers which does not need to be mentioned in Connect as every special case allows for broken implementations but it's a bit late to do anything about that now. Regards Henrik
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 00:18:05 UTC