- From: Mike Dierken <dierken@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:37:52 -0800
- To: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
This may be similar to the situation with validation of HTML - tools exist but not all authors use them. Rather than changing a protocol definition, maybe writing a tool that interested site authors can use would be easier to build and deliver. On 11/29/06, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> wrote: > ons 2006-11-29 klockan 14:18 -0800 skrev Henry Story: > > > Could that be solved my creating a ERR method, so that clients could > > send feedback to servers at the resource they found wanting? > > > > ------------------ > > ERR /page0 HTTP... > > ... > > > > Your Content-Location is broken see spec xyz > > ------------------ > > Interesting idea, but getting this deployed is probably about as hard as > getting the Content-Location headers fixed.. > > also does not solve the problem as browsers won't enable the feature > (Content-Location) until it works reasonably well so they won't notice > the error to report, and site owners won't correct the error until there > is sufficient deployment of browsers making their site fail.. (or at > least sufficient complaints that their server is broken). > > Regards > Henrik > > >
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 23:37:59 UTC