Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

Henrik Nordstrom schrieb:
> fre 2006-10-20 klockan 20:46 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
>> Right. So we don't want the cache to serve the cached response in 
>> absence of the request header, right?
> Only if it has a matching request/response pair from a request absent of
> the header.

I think I disagree. Maybe it's really time to come up with either 
pseudocode or precise formal definitions.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 21:02:28 UTC