Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening from Henrik Nordstrom on 2006-10-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2006)

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:42:55 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161376975.29399.183.camel@henriknordstrom.net>

fre 2006-10-20 klockan 20:46 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:

> Right. So we don't want the cache to serve the cached response in 
> absence of the request header, right?

Only if it has a matching request/response pair from a request absent of
the header.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 20:57:58 UTC