- From: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:40:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
- cc: "'Alex Rousskov'" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, "'Kim Horne'" <kim@pookzilla.com>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I wrote: > Probably if the example had included an explicit Content-length > field in the first group of headers, the ambiguity would go > away, but I think the Message Length rules (section 4.4) don't > require that. Roy Fielding writes: There is no ambiguity. No content-length in a request means length == 0. My mistake. I must have missed the part of RFC2616 that says this. In fact, I still can't find it; perhaps you could point out the specific normative language? -Jeff
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:44:55 UTC