W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: [Fwd: 301/302]

From: David W. Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: Josh Cohen <josh@netscape.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970729230351.11299B-100000@shell1.aimnet.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4003

On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Josh Cohen wrote:

  [NON-Text Body part not included]

The question was whether a 1.0 response w/o content length had to 
be fixed up by a proxy .... my interpretation is that there are
three choices:

1.  Accumulate the body and create a correct content-length before
2.  Add a cunked transfer encoding header and accumulate chunks
    and forward then with proper length fields
3.  Don't report the response as HTTP/1.1 in the status line

All of this of course presumes that the request was HTTP/1.1.

Dave Morris
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 1997 23:10:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC