Koen Holtman wrote:
>
> >The current status hasn't changed in the past two years, so by any
> >reasonable definition those scripts (and the browser) have been broken
> >for a long, long time.
>
> CGI script maintenance is a pain, even if these scripts are provably
> broken in some sense. I see no reason why 1.1 should inflict CGI
> maintenance costs which could be avoided by some spec maintenance.
>
> Koen.
Well, what about when foo.cgi is running on a 1.1 server, and
doesnt give a content-length.
Is the 1.1 server responsible to detect and chunk that ?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Cohen <josh@netscape.com> Netscape Communications Corp.
http://people.netscape.com/josh/
"You can land on the sun, but only at night"