W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1996

Re: Hit-metering: to Proposed Standard?

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 10:42:22 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199611200942.KAA05403@wsooti20.win.tue.nl>
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1915
Jeffrey Mogul:
>Koen writes:
>    Of course, if the reviewing community is small, you will have to come
>    with some convincing evidence that there is enough community interest.
>As we wrote, we have strong evidence that certain large customers are
>eager to deploy this extension.

So who are these customers?  Proxy cache vendors?  Proxy cache
operators?  Eagerness in origin server vendors/operators alone would
not necessarily convince me that this protocol extension will be


Received on Wednesday, 20 November 1996 01:51:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC