Re: Host: header and port number

Larry Masinter wrote:
> As far as the extra port number on Host goes, if you're proposing that
> we put it into the HTTP/1.0 spec, well, it probably could fit into the
> appendix along with all the other stuff that is roughly implemented in
> various places but inconsistently.
> 
> This doesn't preclude us declaring that Host: in HTTP/1.x should not
> have a port number. Right?

That works for us.

--
Rob McCool, robm@netscape.com
Stunt Programmer, Netscape Communications Corporation
It was working ten minutes ago, I swear...
<a href="http://home.netscape.com/people/robm/">A must see.</a>

Received on Tuesday, 23 January 1996 22:23:58 UTC