W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1995

review of byte range draft: please reply

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 13:20:17 PST
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <95Dec29.132020pst.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com>
I'm sorry to have sent out my previous message too quickly.
Please ignore it, and instead reply to the following request:

> I do have interest in getting to consensus about byteranges, and
> additions to the protocol to address cache control with byteranges,
> and other directives in context of that; but I do not want the things
> already defined by the BR spec to change (Accept-ranges:, Range:,
> Content-range:, Content-type:, 206 Partial Content).

If you have any comments about the byte range draft with regard to
those issues, would you please send them asap to the members of the
byte range group?
Received on Friday, 29 December 1995 13:27:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:57 UTC