review of byte range draft: please reply

As far as I can tell, the current members of the 'range retrieval'
review subgroup (Ari Luotonen and Steve Zilles) are content with 


and do not plan to do any additional work on the proposal or any
elements of range retrieval that might be in the current HTTP/1.1
draft, or review to see if there are any differences between the
Luotonen draft and the Fielding http/1.1 draft.

Given this situation, there's no particular reason to delay. Thus, I
would like to poll the working group to see if there is consensus to
accept 'draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-02.txt' as the way in which
range retrieval should be done in HTTP/1.1.

What say you?

Received on Friday, 29 December 1995 13:22:52 UTC