As far as I can tell, the current members of the 'range retrieval' review subgroup (Ari Luotonen and Steve Zilles) are content with draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-02.txt and do not plan to do any additional work on the proposal or any elements of range retrieval that might be in the current HTTP/1.1 draft, or review to see if there are any differences between the Luotonen draft and the Fielding http/1.1 draft. Given this situation, there's no particular reason to delay. Thus, I would like to poll the working group to see if there is consensus to accept 'draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-02.txt' as the way in which range retrieval should be done in HTTP/1.1. What say you?Received on Friday, 29 December 1995 13:22:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:57 UTC