- From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 16:29:33 EST
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: montulli@mozilla.com, eric@spyglass.com
As Larry Masinter's draft IETF meeting notes said, HTTP/1.1 will progress with separate pieces that will be brought together in time for the next IETF meeting. I agreed to try to make progress on State-Info (http://www.research.att.com/~dmk/session.html). (The actual topic area was "state management", and right now there's only the one draft proposal.) I claimed at the meeting, on the basis of http-wg mailing list activity, that there was "rough consensus" for the I-D I wrote, draft-kristol-http-state-info-00.txt. I was advised that I had better confirm that here. So, are there dissenting voices? (I'm really hesitant to do this just before WWW4! How about taking time to read the draft, then responding late next week....) Whether or not there's "rough consensus", there's another important issue: will the browser vendors actually implement it? Absent their acceptance, this whole exercise is academic. What say ye, Netscape (Lou) and Spyglass (Eric)? Others? Dave Kristol
Received on Friday, 8 December 1995 13:33:51 UTC