> > Dave Raggett writes: > > [...] > >> 11) Defined semantics for metainformation > >> o Title, Link, Base, Content-MD5, Content-Language, etc. > > *********** > > Sorry If I'm completly off base but could this be changed > > into "Content-Checksum:". I'd rather not tie MD5 particular > > *algorithm* to the general 'checksum' *functionality*, (just in case > > MD6 pops out in few monthes for instance...) {Though I currently use > > MD5 as the algorithm currently} > No, we are not going to replace a well-defined proposed standard with > a newly-defined invention. Using separate header fields for different > algorithms is just as applicable (and easier to parse) as any > parameterized generic header field. Draft standard, actually -- RFC1864. NedReceived on Thursday, 2 November 1995 21:34:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:56 UTC