- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 13:04:35 PDT
- To: http-wg-request%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, janssen@parc.xerox.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Just FYI: Actually, DCE RPC has been in Windows NT since 3.1; and the Win32 SDK included support for 16 bit Windows, and it is "in the box" for Win95 --- all with threads support to effect non-blocking if you need it. Also, you can more than halve the size of the spec you need to implement by just doing the the UDP version -- which, given that one of the problems with HTTP that everyone talks about is the overhead incurred from opening TCP connections for one-off transactions, seems like a good direction to go. (If the normal interaction between client and server is idempotent, it will only take one round trip...) Lastly, if I were tasked with implementing datagram DCE RPC from the spec, I'd start by looking at the 1990 Prentice Hall book "Network Computing Architecture", by Zahn, et al, which uses a much clearer specificaiton methodology (IMHO) to specify a previous, backwards compatible, version of the DCE RPC protocol. Paul ---------- ] From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org> ] To: <netmail!http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; <janssen@parc.xerox.com>; ] <rsalz@osf.org> ] Subject: Re: Draft Minutes of HTTP Working Group, 33rd IETF Meeting, Stockholm ] Date: Tuesday, August 08, 1995 11:43PM ] ] Bill's comments on DCE are correct enough that picking nits isn't worthwhile. ] Thanks. (Wish I could pay as close attention to his work. :) ] ] On the other hand, it will be bundled with the next release of NT, and ] several not-as-ubiquitous operating systems. :) ] /r$ ]
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 1995 16:20:00 UTC