>If these servers are modifed such that if they see an Accept-Charset >parameter, they label document types correctly, then we'll be 90% of >the way there. Maybe it could even be done without the use of Accept-Charset? I don't like the idea of an ever-growing Accept-Charset header. (Efficiency issues.) Hmmm... perhaps clients should just say "Accept-Charset: *"? >If I were a commercial vendor of WWW browsers, I would probably set >someone about the task of adding charset=xxx support to all the >freeware products, because it'd probably be much cheaper than >maintenace, and development costs associated with not supporting it >correctly. Netscape employees are not permitted to look at freeware source... Don't know about other commercial vendors... ErikReceived on Thursday, 4 May 1995 10:21:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:55 UTC