- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:15:28 +0200
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:05 AM > To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > Subject: RE: Marshalling Depth > 0 responses for REPORTs, WAS: Replacing > t he Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report > > > > The DAV:locate-by-history report finds any collection member > for that history, not just internal members. In particular, > the example in 5.4.1 shows a Depth:0 (the default) request which > finds the /ws/public/x/test.html member of the /ws/public collection. OK, agreed. Somehow, I wasn't paying attention to the distinction between "collection member" and "internal collection member". > So a DAV:locate-by-history report only makes sense with the > default Depth header value of "0". Yes. > What report are you thinking of that makes sense with a non-zero > depth, but which can only be applied to collections? None (anymore), currently.
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 03:16:12 UTC