- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:28:40 -0400
- To: "'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org'" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
For RFC-3253, the intent was to use 405 as a generic response when there wasn't anything more specific you could (or wanted) to say, and use 403/409 when you wanted to give details. So an RFC-3253 client would only expect a DAV:error node in a 403 or 409 response. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Pill, Juergen [mailto:Juergen.Pill@softwareag.com] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:54 AM To: 'Clemm, Geoff'; 'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org'; Nevermann, Dr., Peter Subject: RE: DeltaV methods on locked non-VCR: which response code? Hello, In case of 405 would you expect the response body to contain a packed (DAV:must-be-checked-out, DAV:must-be-checked-in, etc.) or an empty response body? Best regards Juergen -----Original Message----- From: Clemm, Geoff [mailto:gclemm@rational.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 23.01 PM To: 'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org' Subject: RE: DeltaV methods on locked non-VCR: which response code? From: Nevermann, Dr., Peter [mailto:Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com] assume 1) a non-collection *non-VCR* resource at /foo.xml which is *locked* 2) an ordinary collection resource at /bar which is *locked*. We are wondering what the response status code should be in these particular cases (403, 409, 423, ???): CHECKOUT /foo.xml 405 CHECKIN /foo.xml 405 LABEL /foo.xml 405 REPORT /foo.xml Depends on the report request. Since a report is a read-only operation, it doesn't matter that it is write-locked. UPDATE /foo.xml 405 VERSION-CONTROL /foo.xml 423 MKWORKSPACE /bar 403, with DAV:resource-must-be-null in the DAV:error node. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2002 12:29:13 UTC