Next message: Clemm, Geoff: "The 05 versioning protocol draft"
From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:21:53 -0700
Message-ID: <NDBBIKLAGLCOPGKGADOJMEBJDGAA.ejw@ics.uci.edu>
Subject: Revision-set property: unordered?
From reading the -05 draft, the revision-set property (found on history,
baseline, and activity resource) contains an *unordered* list of revision
URLs. Would it be fair to say that a client cannot make any assumptions
about the ordering of revision URLs in the revision-set property? An
alternative might be to order them according to some version/branch
numbering scheme, but this seems like a bit of work for not much benefit.
- Jim